Voltaire Network
Good taste, American style

Ford Foundation, a philanthropic facade for the CIA

Ford Foundation, a philanthropic facade for the CIA

Between 1947 and 1966 the Ford Foundation played a key role in the network of US interference in Europe through the subvention of magazines, scientific programs and non-communist left-wing organizations. The largest philanthropic organization in the world was in fact providing a respectful facade for CIA financial and contact operations. This role was even more possible by the fact that the same persons designed and directed both organizations. Below you will find the first part of our research on the cultural aspects of the Atlantic interventionism.

Voltaire Network
+
JPEG - 11.1 kb

Henry Ford, a militant anti-Semite that published La Juiverie Internationale [1], created the Ford Foundation in 1936. A legendary figure in the automotive industry, he supported all totalitarian projects that existed during the 20th century: prior to 1933 he financed the German national-socialism; in 1938 Hitler granted him the Great Cross of the German Eagle and he provided a large part of the capital of IG Farben Chemist, manufacturer of Zyklon B gas. During the 30’s he also constructed the first auto factories for Stalin, in Gorki and during the 50’s and 60’s he continued manufacturing in the USSR all vehicles destined for the North-Vietnamese army.

JPEG - 11.4 kb
Great Cross of the German Order of the Eagle
Decoration received by Henry Ford on July 30, 1938.

Nevertheless only after his death his foundation reached its summit upon inheriting 70 million dollars of the Ford enterprises thus transforming it into the largest philanthropic association in the world. As Henry Ford II, the new president of the council of administration, expressed, the years 1949-1959 «marked a turnover in the history of the Ford Foundation».

This took place when the USA reached the status of a first-line world power. In Washington, the former Ambassador to the Soviet Union, general George F. Kennan, pushed a campaign to convince its compatriots of the fact that the red menace is bigger than the Nazi one convincing President Truman not to disarm the country, but rather to hide the US war machine and to get ready for a new confrontation.

He also convinced Under Secretary of War, John J. McCloy, into not dismantling the secret service that worked during the II World War, but rather to adapt that service to the new times. He is the theoretician fostering the “stay-behind” tactics, a network initially formed by Natzi and fascist agents that remained behind the front lines after the Reich collapse and that later was used by the Anglo-Americans to continue the fight against communist influence in Europe.

Likewise, a group of industrialists gathered around jurist H. Rowan Gaither Jr. and prevented the dismantling of the research and development service in the War Secretariat, privatizing it and giving it the name of Rand Corporation (Rand is the acronym of Research And Development).

Kennan, after implementing all these, created a permanent and secret structure of the State apparatus by means of the National Security Act, validated by the Congress in 1847. He institutes the CIA, the National Security Council and the Inter-Army Joint Staff. This group also has a public intervention plan, promoted by General George C. Marshall, presented as a loan for reconstruction granted to European states, under the umbrella of Washington and whose implementation is given to Paul G. Hoffman.

JPEG - 6.1 kb
John McCloy

The United States and the USSR are confronting each other in a implacable war, although not directly in the military battle field, something they avoid, but rather in the political, intellectual and social ones. Their achievements in these fields, as well as the space conquer are mere symbolic victories. US foundations, headed by the Ford Foundation, are Washington “soldiers” in this “Cold War”.

The new financial dimension attained by the Ford Foundation in 1947 opened its appetite. The administration council, to redefine its objectives, decided during the Autumn of 1948 to commission a «detailed study (...) to competent and independent persons to serve as a guide on the form (...) where the expanded funds of the Foundation could be used as best as possible in the sake of general interest».

The commission created for that purpose is headed by H. Rowan Gaither Jr., who just created the Rand Corporation thanks to the bank guarantees of the Ford Foundation. Gaither was manager of MIT during the war and had relations with physicists working in the Manhattan [2]. Under the advise of this commission, the council of administration moved the director of the Marshall Plan, Paul G. Hoffman, to the position of president of the Foundation, a role he assumed on January 1st, 1951. According to journalist Volker R. Berghahm, this entails «the broadest and international role designed by the Gaither report for the Foundation,» [3]. The pattern was set: on a parallel basis to the stay-behind network in the political field and the Marshall Plan in the economic one, the Ford Foundation will be the cultural branch for US interference networks in Europe.

Nevertheless, in spite of its appearance, the Foundation is not only a supplementary tool for the device designed by Kennan in the period between 1946 and 1948, but also it is a position of retreat. Within the leading elite in the US that favored the Korean War, the father of the Cold War walked along the path of the extreme right helped by a fearful theoretician, Paul H. Nitze. Likewise, the internal political life is submerged into a "witch hunt", headed by Senator Joseph McCarthy.

Most of the foundations that flourished at the end of the war used a large part of their budget in national programs: thus, the Ford Foundation used from 1951 to 1960, 32,6 million dollars in educational programs, 75 millions in teaching activities for both economy and management, and around 300 millions in hospitals and medicine training schools. Nevertheless, some of its cadres wanted to direct the activity towards the international arena.

A first attempt refers to the Free Russia Fund, whose chairmanship was entrusted, of course, to the father of the Cold War, General George F. Kennan, who finds a way to prolong his career. Its budget was US 200,000 dollars. In July 1951, the Foundation also offered 1,4 million dollars to the Free University in West Berlin. This university had been created in 1948, at that time the oldest Berlin University, and located within the Soviet sector, and it had been “Stalinized”.

In the annual report of 1951, Henry Ford mentioned the “creation of peace conditions”. This program will be aimed at “trying to reduce tensions exacerbated by ignorance, envy and misunderstanding” and to “increase maturity in judgment and stability in determination both in the USA and abroad”. Hoffman created a team devoted to the promotion of this idea of “peace conditions”.

Gathered around him were Rowan Gaither, Milton Katz, his former assistant in the administration of the Marshall Plan (ECA) and Robert M. Hutchins from the Chicago university. As of January 1st, 1952 the team was reinforced by another consultant from ECA, Richard M. Bissell Jr. On July 15, 1952, the budget the Ford Foundation has devoted to international projects was closed to US 13,8 million dollars, that is to say, half of the amount allotted for national programs.

JPEG - 6.6 kb
Richard Bissel

In March 1952, Richard M. Bissell drafted a 16-page document with the title “To Create Peace Conditions”, setting the guidelines for the future program. According to the document, the «aim of the Foundation should be that of contributing to the creation of a scenario where the West will be able, thanks to the new position of the military force under implementation, to negotiate a just and honorable peace with the East».

This will go through “a debate on disarmament” leading to a negotiation process that will create “a favorable public opinion” to this process. Bissell rejects the idea of a direct confrontation, but he does not believe neither in the possibility of disarmament nor in a real peace. He is rather of the idea that «it is possible to live in the same world with the Russians without going into war in spite of the deep and constant differences regarding mentality and interests". For this he creates a doctrine closer to the "peaceful coexistence"» suggested by Kroutchov after the death of Stalin in 1956.

The moderate acting of Bissell is equally applied at a national level: according to his opinion, «the opinion state prevailing in America is too tense and emotional, too close to a religious war». Thus, he is opposed to McCarthyism, but he recommends being prudent. He is of the criteria that any ostensible acting around the idea of disarmament could be misunderstood at the internal level, since the public opinion was not ready to think on a system where there will not be “neither war nor peace”. Bissel proposed that Ford Foundation should not involved publicly in this type of combat, but that it should try to set into motion its idea by collecting data and contacting experts in international relations. In this context, Hoffman went to former Joint Secretary of War, John J. McCloy (who worked as President of the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, predecessor of the World Bank) who joined the Foundation bringing with him one of his aides: Shepard Stone.

According to Volker R. Berhahn, since its very origins, the Ford Foundation initiative was something else than a simple development of a “counterbalance” for McCarthy anti-communism embodied in itself or a battle against the Cold War through more subtle ways. Given the fact that the US has been transformed into a world power and that the world public opinion was not yet ready to face the challenges to come, the aim was that of creating the popular basis for a democratic foreign policy to be implemented by the elites of the East coast and to ensure they will not loose grounds when confronted to the new populist and isolation policies.

Starting on the summer of 1952 Hoffman got involved with Dwight D. Eisenhower, a candidate for the presidential election, hoping to get the seat as Secretary of State in the new administration. A team from the Foundation, headed by Shepard Stone, hurried to draft the Republican presidential candidate program, exploiting the susceptibilities of the Democrats.

The attempt to forge an alliance failed and since is stepping into the White House, Eisenhower designated John Foster Dulles as his Secretary of State. His brother Allen Dulles, is named to head CIA where he takes the toughest stand regarding USSR, developing the "rollback" strategy in Central Europe [4].

These nominations are a new camouflage for the projects of Hoffman, Kennan, Stone, McCloy and Milton Katz, that continue multiplying contacts for liberal intellectuals and experts on international issues to carry out a more diplomatic strategy regarding the USSR. During these meetings ideas emerged regarding the fact that the non-aligned countries could constitute good grounds for pilot projects drafted by the Foundation.

According the files holding the correspondence among different leaders of the Foundation, John J. McCloy was asking himself at that time if "the work they were doing was not more difficult (...) than ruling Germany or trying to establish a European community".

Finally, the leaders of the Foundation, thanks to the contacts held, could consider it a “stimulating element of direction” to rethink the Soviet-American relation according the final report of McCloy and Stone.

According to this document, Western Europe should be a key region whose institutional basis would be strengthen and where the Ford Foundation «could sponsor, in a useful way, the creation of an institution or a series of institutions devoted to the study of problems affecting the European community». This project bears the title Program for Peace Conditions. A consultative committee was created, headed by McCloy, and Shepard Stone assumes the job as its director.

One of its objectives was to draft a method allowing to “obtaining the support from Socialists in Europe for international peace”. Thus, the Foundation should “consider the idea of gathering advanced socialists thinkers from these countries, men with prestige within their own parties, to study the problem of the coexistence and to propose solutions”.

The program provokes personal ambitions. When the influence battle is over, it is placed under the jurisdiction of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) [5] and Shepard Stone transformed himself into a key element acting as head of the Division for International and European Affairs of the Ford Foundation.

No matter what, the Foundation is a tool that each ministerial department wants to use. As of May 5, 1951, Hans Speier, of the Rand Corporation, sends a memo to Rowan Gaither stating that the State Department and the High Civilian Commissioner of Germany wish to disguise their support to organizations in West Germany so that they might not be considered as under the rule of Washington. Thus, together with the CIA, they try to find ways to facilitate funds indirectly.

On March 20, 1952, Milton Katz circulated a memo within the direction of the Foundation recalling the special importance of Europe for US diplomacy. According to this memo, Europe could only be considered “in a constructive way if it is a member of the Atlantic community”. In this sense it is important to contribute to the liberation of «the large French and Italian trade-unions from the grasp of communism».

Katz enumerates then a series of projects by the Ford Foundation such as «the creation of an equivalent of the Committee for Economic Development in continental Europe». It concludes with a list of personalities that could propagate the action by the Foundation: Jean Monnet, Oliver Franks, Hugh Gaitskell, Geoffrey Crowther, Robert Marjolin, Dirk Stikker and Dag Hammarskjöld.

In May 1953 Rowan Gaither drafted a memo mentioning a new principle: the Foundation should avoid «what ever might be a prolongation or a repetition of effective actions by the government or by other agencies». After all, it continues saying, «some of the most important opportunities for the Foundation (...) might be in the fact of completing, stimulating and better the activities of others, especially those of the government». The link US government/Ford Foundation finds here is modus operandi.

With the end of McCarthyism and the beginning of peaceful coexistence, the debate in Washington is softened. The Ford Foundation is no longer seen as an alternative to the CIA, but rather as its associate. Richard Bissel Jr. abandoned the Foundation to take hold of the operative direction of stay-behind, while the Ford Foundation assisted the CIA in several large operations.

It is replaced in the funding of the Congress for Freedom in Culture and entrusted David Lerner and Raymond Aron, an essential figure in the Congress, a study on the failure of the treaty the European Defense Community in France.
It financed the Hungarian Philharmonic Orchestra made up by musicians compelled to exile due to Stalinism and whom the CIA wanted to present as symbols of the free world.

It also financed the American Committee on United Europe (ACUE), a front for the CIA entrusted with supporting the construction of a Federal Europe according to the interests of Washington. The ACUE is headed by the former director of secret services during the War World and its Vice-President is a founding member of the CIA.

The action taken by the Ford Foundation with the Congress in favor of Freedom for Culture is possible, as Grémion explains, given the proximity among the actors staffing both entities. Just like the Congress, the Ford Foundation comprises «liberals» (according to the American sense for this expression), that is to say, by the non-communist left. «A tool for a non-governmental diplomacy, the objective of its leaders (in the field of art) is that of providing a different image of the US culture, away from the frequent image of the mass popular culture».

In that sense, «the Ford Foundation places in that way its action from the beginning, within the framework of an illustrated patronage practice». In the economic field, the action taken by the Foundation «is instilled in the reformist trend of the New Deal» and this gets it favors from the intellectuals in the Congress, that in general support planning and the Welfare State.

Finally it is oriented towards the development of social sciences: Rowan Gaither estimates that, one day, social sciences will allow obtaining brilliant results in the social field such as engineering in the field of technology. The Ford Foundation favors financing social sciences on top of humanity and medicine. It also fosters university and academic exchanges, as well as institutional creations: it finances the Center of European Sociology of Raymon Aron and the network of planners of Bertrand de Jouvenel.

Its presence is so discreet that, according to a memo drafted by Shepard Stone after a trip to Europe in 1954, the Foundation enjoys a great acknowledgment in Europe “even within the circles of the extreme left of the British Labor Party, the German SPD and among numerous leftist intellectuals in France”. Admiration is reciprocal: Shepard Stone feels great attraction towards the European culture, which he opposes to the American popular culture and he feels closer to intellectuals in the Congress, that, after critizing communism “they value the virtues of individual freedom and of a free society”. That is why the finance magazines that are close to the Congress such as Encounter, Preuves y Forum.

After several months of internal conflicts, Shepard Stone obtained the direction over the whole of the European program by the Ford Foundation in mid 1956. The activity waged by the Ford Foundation was expanded. Stone requested a supplementary amount of five million US dollars from the budget simply for the European program. The Hungarian and Polish revolutions of 1956, repressed by the Soviets, convinced all shareholders to grant their demands.

This money allowed to help refugees coming from Hungary or Poland and to create structures to accommodate them. The Ford Foundation equally organized training and study programs for scientists coming the Warsaw Pact, which were invited to the USA and West Europe. In all this there was a sort of perverse game as preferred by special services: the CIA expected to recruit agents among economists, researchers in social sciences and experts invited by the Ford Foundation, while the KGB considered the possibility of sending reliable elements to acquire American knowledge.

At the same time, Japan was launching English language promotion programs, US studies and contacts between Japan and Europe. The philanthropic diplomacy of the Ford Foundation covered the whole world. It took the fostering of the US culture everywhere and tried to win to its side the Non-Aligned Countries. In Africa, the threat of an alignment with Moscow on the part of the recently independent countries motivates the creation of numerous aid programs for that region, especially in Algeria. In the same way an agricultural program have been created in India with the help of European investors to whom Shepard Stone convinced of creating Ford style foundations.

At the university level, the Ford Foundation financed, in 1959, St Antony’s College in Oxford, specialized in Humanities. The European Center of Nuclear Research (ECNR) also received subventions in 1956, as well as the institute run by the Danish nuclear physician Niels Bohr. So the, with the approval of the CIA, the Foundation brings to Denmark delegations of Polish, Soviet and even Chinese scientists, officially, by virtue of the “scientific dialogue”. In that same line, even the Oxford University got a subvention of a million dollars in 1958, just like the Churchill College of Cambridge.

In France, the Maison des sciences de l’homme, under the direction of Gaston Berger, received one million dollars in 1959 for the creation of a social science research center defended by university professors just like Fernand Braudel.

The revelation, in 1966 and 1967, of the financing by the CIA of the Congress for the Freedom of Culture, resulted in a discredit for the Ford Foundation. The idea of a link between the Ford Foundation and the American Secret Service extends all over. But beyond that, is the set of so-called philanthropic actions done by the Ford Foundation in Europe which seen now through a new perspective: isn’t it a formidable operation of American cultural interference?

[1] The International Jew - The World’s Foremost Problem

[2] Pierre Grémion, Intelligence de l’anticommunisme, Editions Fayard, 1995, France

[3] Volker R. Berhahn, America and the intellectual cold wars in Europe, Princeton University Press, 2001.

[4] The "rollback" strategy consists in forcing a retreat of the Russian positions in Central Europe. It opposes the “containment” policy whose objective is to instill the state of the forces present and impede Soviet expansionism. The "rollback" was replaced by "containment" after the collapse of the USSR.

[5] On May 6, 1953, the Council on Foreign Relations organizes a seminar, with Ford Foundation funding, devoted to relations between the USA and the USSR. Attending the seminar are: John J. McCloy (President), Henry L. Roberts (Research Secretary), John Blumgart (Rapporteur), Henry L. Roberts (banker/investor), Robert Amory (CIA), Robert Bowie (Department of State), McGeorge Bundy (Harvard), Merle Fainsod (Harvard), George S. Franklin Jr. (CFR), Howard Johnson (Ford Foundation), Devereux C. Josephs, J. Robert Oppenheimer (Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton), Dean Rusk (President of the Rockefeller Foundation), Shepard Stone and Henry M. Wriston (President of the Brown University)

Covert Action
Although the principle of state sovereignty lies at the heart of international law, the super powers have not refrained from corrupting governments, destabilising societies, eliminating their leaders and even overthrowing regimes by means of covert action. While this form of interference is relatively inexpensive when weighed against the potential gains, it inevitably undermines trust among nations.
The Anglo-Saxons have become the masters of the game. As joint signatories to a 1948 secret military pact (UK-USA + Canada, Australia, New Zealand), they fashioned espionage and covert action tools to serve their common project: the Cold War. They were rivaling in this field against the Soviet Union, over which they had already attained undeniable superiority. Both Maoist China and post-colonial France also resorted to analogous means with a view to securing zones of interest, mainly in Africa.
The landscape changed completely after the demise of the USSR. China stopped financing armed revolutionary groups all around and concentrated on pragmatic intelligence efforts to sustain economic cooperation development. France withdrew from its private reserve in Africa to leave room for the European Union. Having outlived the Yeltsin abyss, Russian intelligence set about restructuring at the national level and in their historical area of influence (newly independent ex-Soviet states) by mobilizing against external intrusions rather than interfering in the affairs of other countries.
As of 1995, the Anglo-Saxons invested massively in their secret services, whose budget tripled over a 15-year period. In addition, they have drawn the Israeli services into their structure either as full members or as subcontractors. In 2009, the Anglo-Saxon services (except Israel) operate on an employment level of 250,000 men and a budget exceeding 100 billion dollars (i.e. 15 times higher than Russia’s, virtually their main competitor). In effect, espionage and covert action have become the essential tools of forced globalisation.
+

Article licensed under Creative Commons

The articles on Voltaire Network may be freely reproduced provided the source is cited, their integrity is respected and they are not used for commercial purposes (license CC BY-NC-ND).

Support Voltaire Network

You visit this website to seek quality analysis that enables you to forge your own understanding of today’s world. In order to continue our work, we need you to support our efforts.
Help us by making a contribution.

How to participate in Voltaire Network?

The members of our team are all volunteers.
- Authors : diplomats, economists, geographers, historians, journalists, military servicemen, philosophers, sociologists. You can send us your article proposals.
- Professional-level mother-tongue translators: you can help us by translating our articles.

International edition
français
English
Español
italiano
Português
عربي
Deutsch
 
81 <span lang='fr'>articles cette semaine dans toutes les langues</span>
255. Il faut à nouveau faire jouer l'« orchestre européen »
« Horizons et débats », 12e année, n° 5, 6 février 2012
Il faut à nouveau faire jouer l’« orchestre européen »
Partenaires, 8 février 2012
 
Syrie : Le double véto russo-chinois inaugure un nouvel ordre mondial Syrie : Le double véto russo-chinois inaugure un nouvel ordre mondial
par Pierre Khalaf, Partenaires, 8 février 2012
 
China wird erster Wirtschaftspartner von Deutschland China wird erster Wirtschaftspartner von Deutschland
Voltaire Netzwerk, 8. Februar 2012
 
Señal de Alerta
Etica bananera
por Herbert Mujica Rojas, Socios, 8 de febrero de 2012
 
فرنسوا هولند يفاوض أمير قطر فرنسوا هولند يفاوض أمير قطر
Shabakat Voltaire, 8 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
 الدبلوماسيات الغاضبة وسيناريوهات الحلول الدبلوماسيات الغاضبة وسيناريوهات الحلول
بقلم عيسى الأيوبي, Shabakat Voltaire, 8 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
أبعد من انتصار نيويورك..اللعبة انتهت أبعد من انتصار نيويورك..اللعبة انتهت
بقلم عيسى الأيوبي, Shabakat Voltaire, 8 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
جلسة الكذب المفتوح جلسة الكذب المفتوح
بقلم عيسى الأيوبي, Shabakat Voltaire, 8 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
Egypt and Syria
Orient Tendencies
Egypt and Syria
by Wassim Raad, Partners, 8 February 2012
 
Les Occidentaux choqués par la popularité russe en Syrie
« Revue de presse Syrie » #47
Les Occidentaux choqués par la popularité russe en Syrie
Partenaires, 8 février 2012
 
كسر إرادات
عروبة ((الشاطئ)) الآخر
بقلم نضال الخضري, Partners, 8 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
كسر إرادات
زيارة لافروف ... ودول الخليج تضغط
بقلم سورية الغد, Partners, 8 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
كسر إرادات
مواقف في لحظات الترقب
بقلم سورية الغد, Partners, 8 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
كسر إرادات
التكتيك الخليجي
بقلم مازن بلال, Partners, 8 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
Moscou et Pékin ont surtout voulu protéger Téhéran
« Revue de presse Syrie » #46
Moscou et Pékin ont surtout voulu protéger Téhéran
Partenaires, 7 février 2012
 
Páginas Libres
MOVADEF y SL: reflexiones estudiantiles
Socios, 7 de febrero de 2012
 
Páginas Libres
Gran Marcha por el Agua: viernes 10, 2 pm
por Guillermo Olivera Díaz, Socios, 7 de febrero de 2012
 
Moscow and Beijing acted primarily to shield Tehran
« SYRIA PRESS REVIEW » #46
Moscow and Beijing acted primarily to shield Tehran
Partners, 7 February 2012
 
 Der GCC und die NATO verlieren ihre Vorherrschaft
Doppeltes Veto um den imperialen Krieg gegen Syrien zu verbieten
Der GCC und die NATO verlieren ihre Vorherrschaft
von Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire Netzwerk, 7. Februar 2012
 
Páginas Libres
¡Luz roja al solmáforo!
Socios, 7 de febrero de 2012
 
Páginas Libres
Alan y Ollanta ocultaron tratos de indulto ilícito a Fujimori
por Guillermo Olivera Díaz, Socios, 6 de febrero de 2012
 
روسيا وتشكيل المنظومة الدولية
الثابت والمتغير في المواقف
روسيا وتشكيل المنظومة الدولية
بقلم Imad Fawzi Shueibi, Shabakat Voltaire, 6 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
رسالة أوباما إلى طهران، الحرب على إيران على نارٍ هادئة... في الوقت الحالي؟ رسالة أوباما إلى طهران، الحرب على إيران على نارٍ هادئة... في الوقت الحالي؟
بقلم Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya, Shabakat Voltaire, 6 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
Páginas Libres
Iglesia católica en conflicto peruano-chileno
Socios, 6 de febrero de 2012
 
 Il GCC e la NATO stanno perdendo la loro leadership
Il doppio veto che impedisce la guerra imperiale contro la Siria
Il GCC e la NATO stanno perdendo la loro leadership
di Thierry Meyssan, Rete Voltaire, 6 febbraio 2012
 
الأوروبيون... أول ضحايا العقوبات على إيران الأوروبيون... أول ضحايا العقوبات على إيران
Shabakat Voltaire, 6 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
ثرثرة
لـ((أغلبية صامتة))!!
بقلم نضال الخضري, Partners, 6 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
سورية
الحدث من حمص
بقلم سورية الغد, Partners, 6 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
التحرك الروسي
وذروة الأزمة
بقلم مازن بلال, Partners, 6 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
قبل وصول لافروف...
ما الذي ستحمله موسكو؟!
بقلم سورية الغد, Partners, 6 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
على أوباما خيارات صعبة في وقت حرج
التقرير الأسبوعي لمراكز الأبحاث الأميركية
على أوباما خيارات صعبة في وقت حرج
Shabakat Voltaire, 6 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
التهديد باغلاق المضيق و تداعياته
التقرير الأسبوعي لمراكز الدراسات الأميركية
التهديد باغلاق المضيق و تداعياته
Shabakat Voltaire, 6 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
Les pressions morales sur la Russie
« Revue de presse Syrie » #44
Les pressions morales sur la Russie
Partenaires, 5 février 2012
 
The GCC and NATO lose their leadership
DOUBLE VETO BANS IMPERIAL WAR AGAINST SYRIA
The GCC and NATO lose their leadership
by Thierry Meyssan, Voltaire Network, 5 February 2012
 
Señal de Alerta
Poder Judicial: ¡otra controvertida licitación!
por Herbert Mujica Rojas, Socios, 5 de febrero de 2012
 
Le CCG et l'OTAN perdent leur leadership
Le double veto pour interdire la guerre impériale contre la Syrie
Le CCG et l’OTAN perdent leur leadership
par Thierry Meyssan, Réseau Voltaire, 5 février 2012
 
UN shenanigans on Syria UN shenanigans on Syria
Voltaire Network, 5 February 2012
 
بهد الفيتو
الحل الروسي..؟
بقلم مازن بلال, Partners, 5 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
سورية..
كل الأدوات في المواجهة
بقلم سورية الغد, Partners, 5 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
طرفة عين..
في سورية
بقلم نضال الخضري, Partners, 5 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
بعد الفيتو..
تحركات سياسية متوازية
بقلم مازن بلال, Partners, 5 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
Moral pressure heaped on Russia
« SYRIA PRESS REVIEW » #44
Moral pressure heaped on Russia
Partners, 5 February 2012
 
Presiones morales sobre Rusia
« Revista de prensa sobre Siria » #44
Presiones morales sobre Rusia
Socios, 5 de febrero de 2012
 
François Hollande verhandelt mit dem Emir des Qatar François Hollande verhandelt mit dem Emir des Qatar
Voltaire Netzwerk, 5. Februar 2012
 
 Moralischer Druck auf Russland
« Presseschau Syrien » #44
Moralischer Druck auf Russland
Partner, 5. Februar 2012
 
El «Proyecto Juicio Final» y los eventos profundos: el asesinato de JFK, el Watergate, el Irangate y el 11 de septiembre
Historia del Estado profundo en Estado Unidos (Segunda parte)
El «Proyecto Juicio Final» y los eventos profundos: el asesinato de JFK, el Watergate, el Irangate y el 11 de septiembre
por Peter Dale Scott, Red Voltaire, 4 de febrero de 2012
 
Páginas Libres
Confunden Detención con Extradición
por Guillermo Olivera Díaz, Socios, 4 de febrero de 2012
 
طبول الحرب في المعسكر الغربي تارة تقرع و تارة تخفت
التقرير الأسبوعي لمراكز الأبحاث الاميركية
طبول الحرب في المعسكر الغربي تارة تقرع و تارة تخفت
Shabakat Voltaire, 4 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
 سياسة الجزرة و العصا الأمريكية
التقرير الأسبوعي لمراكز الأبحاث الأميركية
سياسة الجزرة و العصا الأمريكية
Shabakat Voltaire, 4 شباط (فبراير) 2012
 
Il est urgent d'attendre
« Revue de presse Syrie » #43
Il est urgent d’attendre
Partenaires, 4 février 2012
 
"In Lybia now the truth is coming out"
New York Times interview with Lizzie Phelan
"In Lybia now the truth is coming out"
by Lizzie Phelan, Voltaire Network, 4 February 2012
 
Europe in the US "rotation"
The art of war
Europe in the US "rotation"
by Manlio Dinucci , Voltaire Network, 3 February 2012
 
Páginas Libres
Espionaje chileno no se amedrenta ni ante catástrofes
por Guillermo Olivera Díaz, Socios, 3 de febrero de 2012
 
Señal de Alerta
¡Big brother is watching you!
por Herbert Mujica Rojas, Socios, 3 de febrero de 2012
 
It is urgent to wait
« SYRIA PRESS REVIEW » #43
It is urgent to wait
Partners, 3 February 2012
 
Draft resolution dealing with Syria (by Morrocco) Draft resolution dealing with Syria (by Morrocco)
Voltaire Network, 3 February 2012
 
Es urgente… esperar
« Revista de prensa sobre Siria » #43
Es urgente… esperar
Socios, 3 de febrero de 2012
 
Es ist dringend notwendig zu warten
« Presseschau Syrien » #43
Es ist dringend notwendig zu warten
Partner, 3. Februar 2012
 
L'OTAN se heurte à la Russie et à la Chine
« Revue de presse Syrie » #42
L’OTAN se heurte à la Russie et à la Chine
Partenaires, 2 février 2012
 
 Die NATO stößt mit Russland und China auf ein Hindernis
« Presseschau Syrien » #42
Die NATO stößt mit Russland und China auf ein Hindernis
Partner, 2. Februar 2012
 
Letra abierta para el deshonorable Ban Ki-Moon
Corrupción en la cumbre
Letra abierta para el deshonorable Ban Ki-Moon
por Hassan Hamade, Red Voltaire, 2 de febrero de 2012
 
Die Europäer, erste Opfer der Sanktionen gegen Iran Die Europäer, erste Opfer der Sanktionen gegen Iran
Voltaire Netzwerk, 2. Februar 2012
 
NATO runs up against Russia and China
« SYRIA PRESS REVIEW » #42
NATO runs up against Russia and China
Partners, 2 February 2012
 
La OTAN se estrella contra Rusia y China
« Revista de prensa sobre Siria » #42
La OTAN se estrella contra Rusia y China
Socios, 2 de febrero de 2012
 
Señal de Alerta
TC-Urviola: ¿gato de despensero?
por Herbert Mujica Rojas, Socios, 1ro de febrero de 2012