Voltaire Network

The recolonisation of Libya

To those who believe that the colonial era is over, the examples of Iraq, Libya and Syria exist to prove them wrong. In 2001, the United States decided – in the logic of the ’War on Terror’ – to attack these three countries and a few others. Certainly, the wars against Tripoli and Damascus did not break out until ten years later, the time necessary to deprive these states of their defences, and to build international coalitions in order to mask colonial objectives as humanitarian operations. Let’s look again at the case of Libya.

| Rome (Italy)
+
JPEG - 18.9 kb
Omar el-Mukhtar

In the ambiguous comedy played out in the little theatre of politics, lead actor Renzi proclaimed that in Libya «Italy will play its part» - and as soon as the Pentagon said that Italy will assume the role of «guide», he declared - «Italy’s military mission in Libya is not the order of the day» - whereas in reality, it has already begun, with special forces that the Parliament has placed under the orders of the Prime Minister. However, before giving the official green light, he is waiting for the formation in Libya of a «super-solid government which will not lead us to make the same mistakes we made in the past». So while we wait for the mirage of a «super-solid government» to materialise in the Libyan desert, let’s take a look at the past.

In 1911, Italy occupied Libya with an expeditionary force of 100,000 men. Shortly after the invasion, the Italian army shot and hanged 5,000 Libyans and deported thousands more. In 1930, on the orders of Mussolini, half of the population of Cyrenaïca, about 100,000 people, were deported into about fifteen concentration camps, while the aviation crushed the resistance by bombarding the villages with chemical weapons, and the army surrounded the area with 270 kilometres of barbed wire. The head of the resistance, Omar al-Mukhtar, was captured and hanged in 1931. So began the demographic colonisation of Libya, by setting apart the most fertile land and forcing the populations into the arid land. At the start of the 1940’s, Italy, now beaten, was replaced in Libya by Great Britain and the United States. Emir Idris al-Senussi, placed on the throne by the British in 1951, conceded to these powers the use of Libya’s air, naval and land bases. Wheelus Field, at the gates of Tripoli, became the main US air and nuclear base in the Mediterranean.

In 1956, King Idris concluded a deal which exonerated Italy of the damage done to Libya, and allowed the Italian community to maintain its patrimony. The Libyan oil-fields, discovered in the 1950’s, ended up in the hands of the UK company British Petroleum, the US company Esso, and the Italian company Eni. The brutally repressed nationalist rebellion led to a Nasserian-model bloodless coup d’État in 1969, by the «free officers» directed by Muammar el-Kadhafi.

The monarchy was abolished, and the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya obliged the USA and the United Kingdom to evacuate the military bases and nationalised the foreign properties. In the following decades, according to the World Bank, Libya grew to become part of the «high indicators of human development», with an annual GDP growth of 7.5%, and a wage per citizen which was in the upper-average bracket – Libyan citizens enjoyed universal access to primary and secondary education, and 46% had access to higher education. More than 2 million African immigrants found work there. This state, which constituted a factor of stability and development in North Africa, had, with its investments, favoured the birth of organisms which could have created financial autonomy and an independent currency for the African Union.

The United States and France – as Hillary Clinton’s emails prove - decided to block «the Kadhafi plan for the creation of an African currency» as an alternative to the dollar and the CFA franc. For that reason, and in order to appropriate Libyan oil and territory, NATO, under US command, launched the campaign against Kadhafi, in which the Italian «left-wing opposition» played a major part. The Libyan state was therefore demolished by war and by attacks from the interior by special forces and terrorist groups. The resulting social disaster, which has created more victims than the war itself, especially among the immigrants, opened the door for the reconquest and sharing of Libya. What is Italy now marching into, as it stamps on the Constitution and revisits its colonial past?

Translation
Pete Kimberley

Source
Il Manifesto (Italy)

Manlio Dinucci

Manlio Dinucci Geographer and geopolitical scientist. His latest books are Laboratorio di geografia, Zanichelli 2014 ; Geocommunity Ed. Zanichelli 2013 ; Escalation. Anatomia della guerra infinita, Ed. DeriveApprodi 2005.

 
The EU-Nato Steel Agreement
The EU-Nato Steel Agreement
“The Art of War”
 
Nato/Exit
Nato/Exit’s Vital Objective
“The Art of War”
 
Nuclear Bombs for Italy
Nuclear Bombs for Italy
“The Art of War”
 
The Coiling Anaconda
The Coiling Anaconda
“The Art of War”
 
Voltaire Network

Voltaire, international edition

The Arsonists Are Shouting Fire
The Arsonists Are Shouting Fire
“The Art of War”
 
But was Libya ever a State?
But was Libya ever a State?
“The Art of War”
 
The Hounds of Libya
The Hounds of Libya
“The Art of War”
 

Article licensed under Creative Commons

The articles on Voltaire Network may be freely reproduced provided the source is cited, their integrity is respected and they are not used for commercial purposes (license CC BY-NC-ND).

Support Voltaire Network

You visit this website to seek quality analysis that enables you to forge your own understanding of today’s world. In order to continue our work, we need you to support our efforts.
Help us by making a contribution.

How to participate in Voltaire Network?

The members of our team are all volunteers.
- Professional-level mother-tongue translators: you can help us by translating our articles.

The twilight of NATO
The twilight of NATO
by Thierry Meyssan
Pat Buchanan Talks Up “October Surprise” for Hillary
World Crisis Radio
Pat Buchanan Talks Up “October Surprise” for Hillary
by Webster G. Tarpley, Partners
 
255. The Swiss Patern of Collaboration
«Current Concerns», n°17, August 15th, 2016
The Swiss Patern of Collaboration
Partners
 
254. New Cold War or European Collaboration ?
«Current Concerns», n°16, July 29th, 2016
New Cold War or European Collaboration ?
Partners
 
253. Brexit
«Current Concerns», n°15, July 12th, 2016
Brexit
Partners
 
The EU-Nato Steel Agreement
“The Art of War”
The EU-Nato Steel Agreement
by Manlio Dinucci, Voltaire Network