Voltaire Network

Biographies

Chomsky, A. Noam

17 articles

Español 3 français 5 عربي 4 English 4 italiano 1

Letters to the editor

About your study on Noam Chomsky’s thought

by James Abourezk

About your study on Noam Chomsky's thought

6 December 2006
The United States’ former senator, Jim Abourezk, reacts to Jeffrey Blankfort’s study on Noam Chomsky’s thought, which we published in episode few months ago. He confirms by his account the analysis according to which the Congress support for Israel does not serve the United States’ interests , but comes up to the pressures of the pro-Israeli official lobby.

Controversy (3rd and last part)

How Chomsky eclipsed the influence of the pro-Israeli lobby on the United States’ policy

by Jeffrey Blankfort

How Chomsky eclipsed the influence of the pro-Israeli lobby on the United States' policy

San Francisco (USA) | 5 October 2006
In this last part of his study of Noam Chomsky’s work, Jeffrey Blankfort shows how the latter voluntarily eclipsed the role of the AIPAC. This powerful lobby mobilizes the United-stator Jewish community to put pressure on Congress and to obtain an unfailing support for Israel, often to the detriment of American national interests.

Controversy (2nd Part)

Contrary to Chomsky’s theories, the United States has no interest to support Israel

by Jeffrey Blankfort

Contrary to Chomsky's theories, the United States has no interest to support Israel

San Francisco (USA) | 28 September 2006
We publish, today, the second part of Jeffrey Blankfort’s study on the ambiguities of Noam Chomsky. Having shown, in the first part of his article, the professor’s commitment to support the investments in Israel and to accredit the misleading theory of the guard of the oil wells, Blankfort dissects, below, two other dogmas. On the one hand, far from being a strategic asset for the United States, as Chomsky claims, Israel is a handicap. On the other hand, it is not Washington that prevents the solving of the Israel-Palestine conflict, but Israel itself, which wants to be, simultaneously, a Jewish state and the single state in Palestine.

Controversy (1st Part)

Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict

by Jeffrey Blankfort

Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict

San Francisco (USA) | 20 September 2006
While the Bush administration is sinking into the Iraqi mess and supports the Israeli destruction campaign in Palestine and in Lebanon, a controversy is expanding in the United States on the exact links between the US imperialism and the zionist expansionism. Suddenly, the thought of Noam Chomsky, which was imposed, for a long time, as a reference to the US left-wing, does not function any more. It is the moment, for the journalist Jeffrey Blankfort, to question this superstar. We publish here, in three parts, his long study of the limits of Noam Chomsky’s thought.

Most popular

Damage Control: Noam Chomsky and the Israel-Palestine Conflict
Controversy (1st Part)

How Chomsky eclipsed the influence of the pro-Israeli lobby on the United States’ policy
Controversy (3rd and last part)

Contrary to Chomsky’s theories, the United States has no interest to support Israel
Controversy (2nd Part)

About your study on Noam Chomsky’s thought
Letters to the editor